© 2003-2006 David Moles
Chrononautic Log: infernokrusher |
October 12, 2005Twenty Epics at World Fantasy2:18 PM, Wednesday, October 12, 2005So: Trying to put together a guerilla Twenty Epics reading for World Fantasy. Problem: Venue. Ideas, so far:
Other thoughts?
|
August 11, 2005Report to the Club, Delayed8:06 AM, Thursday, August 11, 2005Things I learned on the way to Scotland:
Things I learned in Scotland:
Things I learned on the way back from Scotland:
But:
|
June 16, 2005Mr. Duncan continues to kick arse10:11 AM, Thursday, June 16, 2005And further convince me that we’ve tapped into something that’s not only seriously funny but hilariously serious: It seems almost banal for me to say — as if it’s news to anyone — that there’s something of a tendency for put-upon geeks to revel in revenge fantasies of intricate detail, imagining sublime immolations and sledgehammers upon skulls . . . But that’s not infernokrusher, to my mind; infernokrusher doesn’t give a shit about such petty rationales as revenge. Infernokrusher takes that little posturing puerile ego in its black trenchcoat out behind the bike sheds, gives him a cigarette and says, settle down, pumpkin. It’s no fun blowing stuff up if you do it out of anger. No. Infernokrusher finds that sorta psychological self-abusing and self-excusing wish-fulfillment wank just . . . well, dull. — Hal Duncan, “Why Do I Infernokrush?” (H)al, I think you’ve just posted either the introduction to, or the lead-off essay for, the first issue of Burn Ward: Dispatches from the Infernokrusher Frontier.
|
June 5, 2005Have I told you yet how much Meghan McCarron rocks?8:31 AM, Sunday, June 5, 2005
|
June 4, 2005Notes toward an Infernokrusher manifesto (updated)10:52 AM, Saturday, June 4, 2005Due to a packing error, it looks as though I’ll be carrying my laptop back to Seattle in its natural state; so it occurs to me that I ought to get this into the Google caches and the Wayback Machine before I go, for posterity. Update: Added slogan, courtesy of Mike Ford. Notes toward an Infernokrusher manifestoSlipstream, ultimately, is just a wussy term. We should be drawing names less from wishy-washy words (slip, stream) and more from monster trucks (krusher, inferno). Literary excellence through superior horsepower. Catch phrases
Redefinitions, subgenres, philosophemes
Pieces, presses, publications, organizations
Deviations and faux-infernokrusher tropes:
The infernokrusher coat of arms
The first Infernokrusher poem
I blew up the plums
— Dora Goss [wiscon]
|
June 3, 2005Hal Duncan is a God-damned genius11:11 AM, Friday, June 3, 2005It was only a matter of time before someone rammed Infernokrusher into the Mundane SF movement, but Hal Duncan has done it with exceptional style and grace: The Mundanes say: That interstellar travel remains unlikely. Warp drives, worm holes, and other forms of faster-than-light magic are wish fulfillment fantasies rather than serious speculation about a possible future. We of the Infernokrusher Movement say: We laugh maniacally in the face of serious speculation. We will have warp drives . . . on our MONSTER TRUCKS! We will have worm holes . . . and bullet holes, and drill holes, and holes punched through the very fabric of the spacetime continuum by the giant fist of MECHAGODZILLA! These are not wish fulfillment fantasies. These are metaphors for the destruction that is an integral part of every possible future. And more importantly, they’re fun. This Is What We’re Saying.™ Because Infernokrusher is all about the fun.
|
May 4, 2005About a dozen randomly selected stories that the “State of Short Fiction” panel might not call slipstream and that don’t have any SFnal or fantastical intrusions but that I like and that I think feel kinda slipstreamy3:21 PM, Wednesday, May 4, 2005
|
May 3, 2005I want my 20th-century schizoid art3:40 PM, Tuesday, May 3, 2005When, exactly, did “slipstream” stop meaning a kind of writing which simply makes you feel very strange; the way that living in the late twentieth century makes you feel, if you are a person of a certain sensibility [Bruce Sterling, Catscan 5] and start meaning stories that feel a bit like magical realism . . . [that] make the familiar strange — by taking a familiar context and disturbing it with SFnal / fantastical intrusions [Rich Horton, quoted in Asimov’s] ? ’Cause that seems to be what it means now. And it’s not cutting it for me.
|
March 22, 2005Not enough Beckett? Or too much Gaiman? (Updated)4:25 PM, Tuesday, March 22, 2005Update: The actual Spinrad article is up on the Asimov’s site. (Thanks to Matt Cheney for the link; see also Matt’s comments there.) On first skim, I actually think Spinrad’s right about the difference between science fiction and fantasy; I just don’t think it has the kind of world-shattering importance that he ascribes to it. Oh, and on a side note, I’d love to see the Stable Strategies press kit that he describes, or something like it, if anyone’s got one. So, it’s agreed that SF is dead, or anyway on its last legs. But the diagnoses of the cause of death, and the prescriptions for how to revivify the corpse, couldn’t be much farther apart, or even much less related to one another: Matt Cheney, “The Old Equations,” Strange Horizons: Instead of encouraging writers who have a sense of the history and substance of genre SF to experiment with form, language, and even the basic meaning of fiction, [today’s SF markets give] the message (most loudly through rejection slips) that to write science fiction means to write as if nothing but the gadgets had changed since John Campbell’s heyday at Astounding in the 1940s. Consequently, the very writers who could revitalize SF and make it a less moribund genre go off and do other things and find audiences that actually appreciate their creativity. Shorter Norman Spinrad, via Paul Melko: SF is the visionary literature, the only literature that requires the reader to “create belief.” This is opposed to fantasy where no suspension of disbelief is required; fantasy is clearly not meant to model the real world, so the reader can breeze through places where it doesn’t. . . . SFWA . . . allowing the SF in its name to mean Science Fiction and Fantasy: a portent of doom to the genre! All about form? Or all about content? Who’s right? I’m inclined to think they’re both wrong, but maybe it’s all three of us. Thoughts?
|
November 25, 2003Christopher Priest on slipstream12:54 PM, Tuesday, November 25, 2003While we’re talking interstitiality, the Guardian has posted undersung genius Christopher Priest’s top 10 slipstream books list:
Interestingly (to me, anyhow), I haven’t read any of these — though I’ll bet I’ve read most of the stories in the Borges collection. I did try to read Light, but gave up a third of the way into it — sorry, Mr. Harrison! Ballard’s short fiction I’ve enjoyed, when it doesn’t too quickly date itself, but I’ve been slow on catching up with the novels. As for Coupland, while I dug Generation X and Microserfs, back in the day, I couldn’t get into Shampoo Planet; and I lost interest in Girlfriend in a Coma once I found out that it was actually about, y’know, the narrator’s girlfriend, like, in a coma. Most of the rest on Priest’s list I’ve barely heard of, if I’ve heard of them at all. Anyone know more? (Courtesy of Bruce Sterling.)
|